Journal
| Title | Discrimination of Juvenile Yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and Bigeye (T. obesus) Tunas using Mitochondrial DNA Control Region and Liver Morphology Posted by Ivane Gerasmio |
| Authors | Ivane R. Pedrosa-Gerasmio ,Ricardo P. Babaran, Mudjekeewis D. Santos |
| Publication date | 2012/04/19 |
| Journal | PLOS ONE |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Publisher | PLOS |
| Abstract | Article Authors Metrics Comments Media Coverage Correction Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Materials and Methods Acknowledgments Author Contributions References Reader Comments (0) Media Coverage (0) Figures Correction 23 May 2012: Pedrosa-Gerasmio IR, Babaran RP, Santos MD (2012) Correction: Discrimination of Juvenile Yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and Bigeye (T. obesus) Tunas using Mitochondrial DNA Control Region and Liver Morphology. PLOS ONE 7(5): 10.1371/annotation/204a41f1-b918-463f-b444-00313899c455. https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/204a41f1-b918-463f-b444-00313899c455 View correction Abstract Yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares (Bonnaterre, 1788) and bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus (Lowe, 1839) are two of the most economically important tuna species in the world. However, identification of their juveniles, especially at sizes less than 40 cm, is very difficult, often leading to misidentification and miscalculation of their catch estimates. Here, we applied the mitochondrial DNA control region D-loop, a recently validated genetic marker used for identifying tuna species (Genus Thunnus), to discriminate juvenile tunas caught by purse seine and ringnet sets around fish aggregating devices (FADs) off the Southern Iloilo Peninsula in Central Philippines. We checked individual identifications using the Neighbor-Joining Method and compared results with morphometric analyses and the liver phenotype. We tested 48 specimens ranging from 13 to 31 cm fork length. Morpho-meristic analyses suggested that 12 specimens (25%) were bigeye tuna and 36 specimens (75%) were yellowfin tuna. In contrast, the genetic and liver analyses both showed that 5 specimens (10%) were bigeye tuna and 43 (90%) yellowfin tuna. This suggests that misidentification can occur even with highly stringent morpho-meristic characters and that the mtDNA control region and liver phenotype are excellent markers to discriminate juveniles of yellowfin and bigeye tunas. |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035604 |
| URL | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035604 |