Journal
| Title | A multicriteria analytical framework for sustainability evaluation under methodological uncertainties Posted by Joel Opon |
| Authors | Joel Opon; Michael Henry |
| Publication date | 2020/04/15 |
| Journal | Environmental Impact Assessment Review |
| Volume | 83 |
| Pages | 106403 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Abstract | Multicriteria analysis is widely used to perform sustainability evaluation for purposes such as decision making or progress assessment following a chosen sustainable development concept. The stages of multicriteria analysis include indicator selection, data characterization, normalization, weighting, and aggregation. However, due to the various framings of sustainability, non-equivalent approaches could be adopted at each stage, introducing methodological uncertainty. Consequently, depending on the methods chosen, divergent and conflicting conclusions or decisions may result. This paper addresses the issue of methodological uncertainties in sustainability evaluation by analyzing how methodological uncertainties arise during multicriteria analysis, then proposing an analytical framework that employs uncertainty and sensitivity analyses to quantify and manage the effects of methodological uncertainties. The consideration of methodological uncertainties in the structure of multicriteria sustainability evaluation shifts the analysis from deterministic to probabilistic, which is advantageous to arrive at robust and homogenized sustainability conclusions or decisions. |
| Index terms / Keywords | Sustainability; Sustainability evaluation; Multicriteria analysis; Uncertainty analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Decision-making |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106403 |
| URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195925519305190 |